Another Day, Another Hate Crime

I have not refused to provide evidence, and the sources are easily rejected depending on your position. I didn’t denote that I had credibility, or that you should believe me.

Court records do not state that I molester creatures – but they claim that the victim is a prostitute. The former has no evidence.

“Now let me contradict you, by quoting you directly.”

You are aware that by the time I wrote that I heard new information regarding the occupation of the victim. So, nope. No contradiction.

I claimed something, there is no explicit rule enforcing me to provide you with evidence or proof that suggests the occupation of the victim. And, I’m not form England.

I have no obligation to provide you with evidence or proof inclined to her controversial occupation; thus negating your claim that I am irresponsible.

Responsibility is the obligation to respond to a consequence, or a claim, etc. Not a shame.

It’s okay to make a claim without a basis. It’s not okay to make a claim without a basis and pretend you do.

Evidence: http://www.uscourts.gov

And you’ll have to pay for it.

You clearly missed the point.

I’ve told you previously, there are apparent court records that are open to the public.

Dishonestly is knowingly lying. I’m clearly not, but you’re superficial enough to assume it.

“Like I said, you and I apparently have a fundemental disagreement on this issue. You think it is ok, I clearly think not. There is nowhere else to go with this issue.”

Think what is OK? And what do you mean nowhere else? We aren’t anywhere if you’ve self-evidently remained ignorant to what I am saying.

“This is where the fundamental split has occurred. I think it is irresponsible, and yes, dishonest to do what you have just said is OK.”

So many contradictions. How can you earnestly say that? You’ve likely claimed a lot with no basis. You’re claiming I am irresponsible, dishonest and childish with no basis. You assert the anecdotal but fail to justify why I am childish. Simply saying “I think it is irresponsible” isn’t a reason, and referring to it as self-evident is a logical fallacy – it begs the question. You are killing yourself with your own logic, it’s amusing to watch.

“… you have admitted to posting something without basis. That is just as dishonest as a genuine lie is.”

If I am beaten up tomorrow and I claim that I didn’t start the fight–with no basis; is it as dishonest as a genuine lie?
Your logic is haunting.

I understand your point, that’s why I’m arguing against it.

“You willingly, and knowingly made a comment for which you had no basis”

You’ve missed the point entirely, again. Why do you have to make it seem so perplexing? It’s quite simple. My basis is court records. If someone willingly and knowingly made a comment with court records as evidence, that, to you, is no basis? Maybe you’re just referring to the fact that I haven’t sent you a direct URL. Well, sorry, but you have to pay for court records.
These apparent court records have been mentioned in many articles; you believing them or not doesn’t change their legitimacy.

“Your definition of dishonesty may be a dictionary definition but it is overly simplistic.”

So your definition has been fabricated? Yes, because I want a fabricated definition. Yes sir.

I haven’t insulted you, it’s odd that you claim a lot but have no basis for them.

“I said “I think” (meaning it is my opinion) that making a claim without basis, and presenting it as a fact, is irresponsible, and dishonest.”

It being subjective or objective does not omit that it requires a basis. But, agian, you’ve contradicted yourself.
My original message was: “I am almost certain that the victim is a prostitute”, meaning it is my opinion. “I am” is constituting a personal opinion, feeling, etc. You’ve contradicted yourself by assuming that your opinion doesn’t require evidence when mine does.

“There is a distinction there, I would appreciate it if you recognized it.”

Ironically appropriate.

“I don’t agree that making disparaging comments about some ones character”

I didn’t disparage her character, unless you consider prostitution disparaging. Again, this is fabrication.

“You very clearly do.”

Axiomatically not.

“Of course if you make a claim that some one hit you without provocation you are not inherently being dishonest”

Dishonesty is deceitfulness. If him hitting me for no reason is a lie or not, you are unaware of it being so. Assuming it to be a lie is negative and infantile.

“….if you claimed that he hit you because he is a racist, homophobe and refused to provide any sort of justification as to why”

This isn’t what I am arguing. You’ve missed the point again.

“…If you truly believe that the only way to be dishonest is to blatantly tell a lie”

Again and innately, you are incorrect. I didn’t assert this, you are attacking a straw man.

“Again, quoting you:
“I am basing my claim on word-of-mouth. I don’t have any evidence.””

I’ve already dealt with this, mentioning it again makes your inability to fathom something so basic is ridiculous.

(I felt the need to mock your logic.)

More evidence of you being infantile and jejune.

I didn’t insult you before you claimed I did.

Regarding me as a troll makes your inability to refute me most self-evident. Thanks for clearing that up, buddy.

Great argument, Pieman.

“I am basing my claim on word-of-mouth. I don’t have any evidence.”

Again, I posted that earlier than I posted the latter quotes. (I hope you’re trolling by posting that.)

“I am asserting a definite fact.”

This was an example of an opinion. I am asserting something that I consider a fact. Probably something to do with it being a fact.

I’ve shown how you have contradicted yourself several times and you attempt to mock me. As soon as I present a rebuttal you crawl into your basking hole of incredulity.

You evidently know that you’ve self-refuted and now you’re attempting to subtly justify it by regarding my arguments as tiresome, etc.

Feeble arguments. Feeble arguments everywhere.

You seem to be confused. I claimed something but I did not originally claim I had evidence. I don’t need to provide sources because the only reason to do so is, I will be correct. Being correct on this topic isn’t currently interesting – gathering information is. And, fi you want to quote me to negate my claim then go ahead.

Insulting me makes you look like someone with a weak opinion that I shouldn’t take seriously.

I’m not defensive about the evidence of my claim, I’m defensive about what I claimed.

You’ve just claimed that I look like a retard. Please cite that with a reference that suggests that. I may have to call you a name if you don’t.

Currently, the contrary applies.

You took me seriously, then pretended you didn’t, and now you’re speechless?

Also credit card forgery, theft and other crimes.

Sorry, the victim has not only been to court because of prostitution but, disorderly conduct, assault, etc.