Dear Santa…

Comments (50)

#1 written by Andrew
about 1 year ago

Reply Quote

That’s pretty sexy… except that its a 5 year old…
- #2 written by O2Live42
  about 1 year ago
  
  Reply Quote
  
  He looks young for 18!
#3 written by Wrecker3D
about 1 year ago

Reply Quote

He’s just “short for his age”, but he’s actually 18+ *wink*

If such a santa excisted I would love that list (legal age list)
#4 written by Jens
about 1 year ago

Reply Quote

I want that list too!
#5 written by Dewboy
about 1 year ago

Reply Quote

ROTFLMAO!! I never thought of it that way!!
qee, no wonder Santa didn’t bring me my whole wish-list! lol!
- #6 written by Bruce Tharp
  about 1 year ago
  
  Reply Quote
  
  Just be happy you got a response from Santa. I can imagine what you had on that list.
  - #7 written by Dewboy
    about 1 year ago
    
    Reply Quote
    
    @ Bruce Tharp – a lot! haha. true! it wasn’t till i was bout 10 or 11 that i fiqured out it wasn’t all about ME an what i was qettinq!
    
    Merry Christmas Eve, Bruce!
#8 written by Rokker
about 1 year ago

Reply Quote

haha! I know I’m on Santa’s list of bad boys! My phone number is … oh, wait … I never even got a damn phone for Christmas!
#9 written by The_Unknown
about 1 year ago

Reply Quote

*goes off and writes to santa for this*
#10 written by mike
about 1 year ago

Reply Quote

Depending on the way you view things, naughty can be oh so nice, yes? :)
#11 written by Falcon stone
about 1 year ago

Reply Quote

Call me weird, but I want a good sweet boy :)
- #12 written by sylvatica
  about 1 year ago
  
  Reply Quote
  
  Your’e weird, lol
#13 written by PenboyX
about 1 year ago

Reply Quote

Interesting how the use of “bad” so many times is a reference to “sex.”
- #14 written by Bruce Tharp
  about 1 year ago
  
  Reply Quote
  
  Because sex is a sin
  - #15 written by The Pope
    about 1 year ago
    
    Reply Quote
    
    It is THE original sin.
- #16 written by weled
  about 1 year ago
  
  Reply Quote
  
  it’s so bad it’s good :)
  - #17 written by jaackov
    about 1 year ago
    
    Reply Quote
    
    کن عبداً لله
#18 written by Ivan
about 1 year ago

Reply Quote

I thought eating the apple was the Original Sin…
- #19 written by Rokker
  about 1 year ago
  
  Reply Quote
  
  Ivan is right – only it wasn’t just eating the apple per se. It was that eating the fruit was an act of disobedience.
  
  If sex was a sin, there would be no human race – in fact there would be no life at all !!
  - #20 written by Bruce Tharp
    about 1 year ago
    
    Reply Quote
    
    I wonder why an apple was chosen for the metaphor? Why not a banana? That would represent forbidden fruit for sure.
    - #21 written by PenboyX
      about 1 year ago
      
      Reply Quote
      
      Because when they were frantically making up this idiotic story, that’s probably what came to their mind at first — or they had a bowl of apples in front of them while they were dreaming up this bs.
      - #22 written by Dashiell
        about 1 year ago
        
        Reply Quote
        
        Hmmm, what would have happened if Adam had f#@ked the apple?
        
        #23 written by PenboyX
        about 1 year ago
        
        Reply Quote
        
        What a dumbass Adam! Everyone knows a watermelon is better for “f#@k[ing].”
        
        #24 written by Rokker
        about 1 year ago
        
        Reply Quote
        
        How do you know it wasn’t a watermelon? If y’all had actually read the story for yourselves before jumping on the “bs” bandwagon and done your own research, you’d know that no apple was even mentioned! It was probably some dumbass atheist that made that one up.
        
        #25 written by Bruce Tharp
        about 1 year ago
        
        Reply Quote
        
        So it may have been a banana and Adam’s true preference.
        
        #26 written by PenboyX
        about 1 year ago
        
        Reply Quote
        
        “… and done your own research, you’d know that no apple was even mentioned! It was probably some dumbass atheist that made that one up.”
        
        Research about what? Some bullshit story that you appear to think you believe in? Get real.
        
        And if it were an Atheist, then the fruit would more probably be accurate — since nothing in that bs story is truthful anyway. Atheists would make up better stories anyway.
        
        #27 written by Rokker
        about 1 year ago
        
        Reply Quote
        
        Yep, I agree – and make them up they certainly have!
        
        #28 written by Bruce Tharp
        about 1 year ago
        
        Reply Quote
        
        What about my banana hypothesis? That would add fruitfulness to the research.
        
        #29 written by Dashiell
        about 1 year ago
        
        Reply Quote
        
        Your theory certainly would add another layer of nuance to that now famous scene from Weeds with Uncle Andy little “off the cuff” lecture to young Shane.
        
        Did you know that a bunch of bananas are referred to as a “hand” of bananas? Hmm, I’m suddenly feeling very Zen with the interconnectedness of everything.
        
        #30 written by Bruce Tharp
        about 1 year ago
        
        Reply Quote
        
        I did not know about the “hand of bananas” but now I truely feel enlightened.
        
        #31 written by Dewboy
        about 1 year ago
        
        Reply Quote
        
        @ Dashiell – allow me to qive you a hand with that banana… :)
        
        #32 written by Dewboy
        about 1 year ago
        
        Reply Quote
        
        @ Bruce Tharp – Bananas…Bruce, you have such a twisted mind! {like me! LOL}
        
        #33 written by Bruce Tharp
        about 1 year ago
        
        Reply Quote
        
        I’m not the first to give banana’s a bad wrap.
        
        #34 written by Dashiell
        about 1 year ago
        
        Reply Quote
        
        When an atheist makes up a story, it’s properly labeled “fiction”. We may author stories, but none so imaginative and fanciful as the Holy Bible or any other scripture that is held up as the “word of God”. Those are truly some amazing pieces of fiction.
        
        #35 written by Bruce Tharp
        about 1 year ago
        
        Reply Quote
        
        All time best sellers.
#36 written by weled
about 1 year ago

Reply Quote

The early boy gets the worms? *still a tad too young for snakes*
As the twig is bent, the tree is inclined? *English is a /very/ interesting language*

Gonna think of more captions :)
#37 written by Rokker
about 1 year ago

Reply Quote

Dashiell:

When an atheist makes up a story, it’s properly labeled “fiction”. We may author stories, but none so imaginative and fanciful as the Holy Bible or any other scripture that is held up as the “word of God”. Those are truly some amazing pieces of fiction.

ROFLMFAO !!! Oh really? Well what about all these masterful pieces of atheist fiction deliberately dreamed up to deceive the world? Methinks that you are one of the likely victims!

http://www.nwcreation.net/evolutionfraud.html
- #38 written by PenboyX
  about 1 year ago
  
  Reply Quote
  
  “… masterful pieces of atheist fiction deliberately dreamed up to deceive the world?”
  
  Atheists don’t “dream up” bullshit like what you believe to “deceive the world.” You really need to get real. Burning bush talking? And you were talking about deceiving the world? And then cause hundreds of wars over that fucking nonsense?
  
  Wait. The best one ……. some “all-powerful god” [who makes everything] doesn’t even want to have the pleasure of sex so he “impregnates a virgin” then has her give birth in a fucking barn next to animals in one of the worst areas of the world among the most ignorant and superstitious people in the world. Yeah ……. that’s telling us. Get fucking real.
  - #39 written by Rokker
    about 1 year ago
    
    Reply Quote
    
    Yeah, whatever, Penboy! [Rolls eyes and hopes that one day Penboy will deal to that anti-religious chip on his shoulder]
    - #40 written by kinkynik
      about 1 year ago
      
      Reply Quote
      
      Good trolling.
    - #41 written by PenboyX
      about 1 year ago
      
      Reply Quote
      
      “Yeah, whatever, Penboy! [Rolls eyes and hopes that one day Penboy will deal to that anti-religious chip on his shoulder]”
      
      That’s the best you can do? Give me a break. You religious can never answer any argument/debate with anything even remotely considered as facts/truthfulness.
      
      Also, Atheists don’t have any “anti-religious chips on our shoulders” — that’s only for you, the ignorant religious — because you have this need to keep pushing “that chip” onto the shoulders of everyone else you see/meet (in “god’s name”). What a laugh.
      
      Next time, try some real facts (at least you can try to make up something as “real facts”). But, as you see, you have one of UK’s most ignorant nutcases, kinkynuts, helping you out.
      - #42 written by Dewboy
        about 1 year ago
        
        Reply Quote
        
        @ PenboyX – Also, Atheists don’t have any “anti-religious chips on our shoulders”
        Oh but YOU unequivocally do…as is SO evident by all your idiotic comment.
        
        #43 written by PenboyX
        about 1 year ago
        
        Reply Quote
        
        Can anyone be more socially and religiously stupid than you? Unless I’m posting sarcasm and humor, I always use common sense ……. unlike any and all religious idiots like you. And my “dare” goes to you as well: “You religious can never answer any argument/debate with anything even remotely considered as facts/truthfulness.”
        
        You have never offered a single fact or truism when you so diligently defend religion — I always have — check with any of the scientific community or intelligent professors of history if you have the balls. The only thing you’ve done is attack me personally (because “you get tired of hearing” the truth) but have never debated or argued with anything even remotely considered true facts.
        
        #44 written by Dewboy
        about 1 year ago
        
        Reply Quote
        
        religious (idiot)? I never said i was religious. I merely point out, as I always have, how you unkindly, continually bash people for their beliefs.
- #45 written by Dashiell
  about 1 year ago
  
  Reply Quote
  
  Nice Link. Just as you find my incredulity amusing, so I find it wholly ironic that religion would point to deceptions perpetrated on an infant scientific community, and imagine this somehow justifies it’s own wholesale fraud. It is worthwhile to note that it was the scientific community that revealed these fake fossils as the junk-science that they were, not religious pundits.
#46 written by Rokker
about 1 year ago

Reply Quote

PenboyX:

That’s the best you can do? Give me a break. You religious can never answer any argument/debate with anything even remotely considered as facts/truthfulness.

It’s not that I can’t – it’s that I won’t. And there are three reasons for that:

1. It’s pointless debating with someone who has already made their mind up and has closed off to even considering for a moment other viewpoints.

2. Milkboys is not the appropriate forum for science / religious debate.

3. This thread has gone wildly off topic. Time now to return to the humour of the original post.

Have a happy day!
- #47 written by Dashiell
  about 1 year ago
  
  Reply Quote
  
  @Rokker, you are more than welcome to come over to the board, where there is ample opportunity to provide intelligent, thoughtful debate on the subject of science and religion. While I am admittedly in the “atheist” camp, I’d be eager to respectfully engage your best efforts.
- #48 written by PenboyX
  about 1 year ago
  
  Reply Quote
  
  “It’s not that I can’t — it’s that I won’t. And there are three reasons for that:”
  
  Thank you for proving what I just posted.
  
  “1. It’s pointless debating with someone who has already made their mind up and has closed off to even considering for a moment other viewpoints.”
  
  May I just point you to what you’ve just said?: “Well what about all these masterful pieces of atheist fiction deliberately dreamed up to deceive the world?” You are every bit as “close-minded” as I am. But here’s the difference: I’ve gained all my reasoning from common sense, understood logic and reading about and hearing from the scientific community at large (not those from religious states who agree with their governments because of the fear of imprisonment or death). I do not and will not “rely” on any religious source for anything that needs to be factual.
  
  “Methinks that you are one of the likely victims!”
  
  With that, you are 100% correct — when I was young — too young to know, understand and accept reasoning. I had an epiphany immediately after 11/22/63 and then I realized by the age of 14 how all of this “god” crap was ….. well, exactly that.
  
  “2. Milkboys is not the appropriate forum for science / religious debate.”
  
  Milkboys has several threads for exactly that kind of discussion. Visit them — if you seriously think you’re not as close-minded as your posts says, then you could easily be enlightened. Show me absolute scientific facts about “god,” “jesus & his birth & his [their] magical tricks” and anything else from those religious books (those books are not scientific and/or factual).
#49 written by Dewboy
about 1 year ago

Reply Quote

@ PenboyX – Your “sense” is ANYTHING but common…
- #50 written by PenboyX
  about 1 year ago
  
  Reply Quote
  
  Read my above response to you (if you have any ability to actually read and comprehend it) ….. I’m not repeating it.

Dear Santa…

Himbeer

Blogs

Sites