Fapping Friday *13


milkboys is a community for & about queer boys. Hang out & connect with other LGBT teens without worrying about prejudices or bullies. Here you're home :)
If you want to meet other milkies & talk about everything queer or not you should check out our board. With more than 25.000 members you will surely find someone or something interesting.
The purpose of this blog is to keep you updated about everything going on in the queer world and beyond on one hand and to collect, perpetuate and exhibit pieces of art and documentation related to the coming of age on the other. Please refer to our FAQ if you have further questions. Enjoy your stay, leave comments, have some hot chocolate :3
If you found an article, film, video, song, picture or whatever else you'd like to share with our readers please go ahead and give us a heads up about it here!
Mystique theme by digitalnature | Powered by WordPress | We do not assert ownership of content posted here; it belongs to the respective owners. Please notify us if we have posted something that belongs to you for removal. | U.S.C. 2257 Notice

about 8 months ago
Beautiful….. but that little metal ring… OUCH !
about 8 months ago
Umm…that’s a lot to talk about.
about 8 months ago
Why do guys always put those clamps on their wieners…?
about 8 months ago
About cock rings….if you are determined to use one, use the kind that are leather and have adjustable snaps. On SOME people, the steel ring will constrict your flow and contribute to a retrograde ejaculation that MAY cause your prostate to become infected. I know this because it happened to me and I’ve been dealing with an on/off again infection for 15yrs. Tighter is not better when it comes to steel cock rings….trust me. The sensation IS incredible when you cum, but the tendency then is that more should be better ( the male creed)…nay nay!
about 8 months ago
Now that was informative even though I have never had even a remote desire to use one. I think this would be good information for the kids on this site to know.
about 8 months ago
Just want to add, I’ll bet they don’t teach that is Sex Ed.
about 8 months ago
Notice I used all caps for “SOME” and “MAY”. This was to prevent posters like the puff adder accusing me of using absolutes, or not knowing what I’m talking about. 15yrs of this has given me some insight into prostate infection.
about 8 months ago
nope, never had it in sex ed…
Then again my sex ed as I recall never went beyond basic reproduction 101 and a class on VDs, STDs and STIs.
Toys were not an option in junior high.
about 8 months ago
What sort of “infections” are you talking about? I used to use cock rings as it turned my partner on, but stopped when we split (which was recent).
about 8 months ago
so thats what those ring things are for, better release ?
about 8 months ago
I read a medical article last week where doctors say that shaving your pubic hair is very unhealthy. Maybe even more that the cock ring I might guess.
about 8 months ago
let’s see a link to that, please. not doubting you saw it, but alarmist reports like that deserve being referenced
about 8 months ago
I can’t imagine why….do post a link to the article because it sounds like well treacle.
about 8 months ago
Actually a little research finds the original article titled “the war on pubic hair must end”.
http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2011/04/war-pubic-hair.html
about 8 months ago
I saw at least two more medical articles recently also about the problems and dangers associated with shaving pubic hair. I’m glad you provided this link for those who stubbornly cling to their myths, prejudices, dogmas and ignorance.
about 8 months ago
I like my cuties slim and smooth but there should always be grass on the wicket before you bowl on it.
Boy’s should have a bush, trim it by all means but a completely shaved crotch is a turn off.
about 8 months ago
The article/link is more of a opinion by a Net doc. What he doesn’t say is that if you shave so that you have no irritation, bumps, cuts etc, it shouldn’t be a problem.
about 8 months ago
Actually a little research shows this guy to pretend to be someone he isn’t.
That article is typical Internet bullshit from someone who just wants to “kick up some Internet dust” and attempt to make a name for himself. Shaving pubic hair has no more ill effects than post-puberty boys and men shaving their faces. Take common sense precautions and it’s fine.
He’s trying to make something more out of it than what’s needed. The title alone is designed to scare you and “listen to him”: “The war on pubic hair must end”. War? What fucking war? Against hair removals? Give us a break. And, take his description of pubic hair: “… and is the visible result of long awaited adolescent hormones, certainly nothing to be ashamed of or embarrassed about”. How about just cutting to the chase and telling it as it is: it’s primary purpose is sexual attraction. (And he couldn’t tell you the other main purpose? Air conditioning.)
And we all have our ways and designs of and for attraction. If you want to shave, then shave it. And you can do it in several ways. Just use common sense and be careful and every way is fine — if one method is not to your liking or irritates your skin, then use another method, carefully.
about 8 months ago
I’ve come to the conclusion that you are contrary for contrariness’ sake (of course, you will say that you’re not)
about 8 months ago
Hi Salty,
I totally shave off all my pubic hair, as my current boyfriend likes to see my wee willie winkie totally bald. I’m 24 and don’t even shave anywhere else, well except my armpits. I still don’t have ANY Facial hair. So why is shaving pubes, or underarm hair for that matter, unhealthy?
Stephen.
about 8 months ago
the ring. no thanks.
about 8 months ago
Thanks Real1; That is something you would never get in sex ed. As for the shaving thing from Salt Lake, I had asked my doctor about it and was told that a lot of men where doing this and the only side affect would be it you cut yourself. Other then that it’s clean and he said that there was no primary reason for this hair in this time. Just be careful.
about 8 months ago
I developed pubic hair at around 12 , the boys I played strip poker with were slightly younger and did not have pubes so I kinda felt like a freak.
about 8 months ago
It was the reverse for me; maturing early made me a teen god with my friends who hadn’t…..which led to a lot of sexual ‘play’.;-)
about 8 months ago
I’m way jealous. When I was 12 I was always waiting for people to want to experiment with me because I thought that’s what boys at that age do. However, it seems that ironically being openly gay is the number one way to prevent anything like that from happening.
about 8 months ago
You have a good point there….the boys I ‘played’ with were all closet types. Even in the ground rules, it was often said, “This is just practice for girls, right?”. You bet, sweet cakes. However lonely coming out @12 may be, you are sooooo ahead of the game! Besides, camp was my mecca-were I really got to experiment big time.
about 8 months ago
LOL.. Same here! Got to play with some very cute boys in 7th and 8th grade because of it. Every boy who asked me over after school wanted to masturbate together. Every sleepover was an orgy. Good times!
about 7 months ago
All this talk of adolescent fun makes me so jealous!
As an adolescent of the late 90′s/early 00′s, I don’t think there has been a worse period in time regarding lack of boys to explore with. Gay had become an “identity”, but no-one in my school was openly gay, Lord help anyone who would of been, such was the homophobic feeling (from students and teachers alike).
Ironically, I think curiosity and sexual exploration between boys seems to have been most liberal in the 60′s and 70′s, when homophobia was rife, but there was little in the way of a “gay identity”, so boys could explore without guilt/confusion/anxiety over sexual preference or social nonsense such as the term “gay”. It was just sex, it didn’t have frankly ridiculous social connotations (especially for teenagers who may end up straight or bi-sexual).
Also, there is the increasing pressure from adults that “their children” (in much the same way they think of “their dog”, as chattel property) remain sexless innocents for as long as possible contra to the reality of earlier pubescence, the “child abuse” industry (where even children can be abusers) and the whole idea of the “sanctity of youth” and an ever increasing age when one in regarded is still regarded as a youth. Yet a day either way an you can be legally and morally deemed to be an adult, what a crazy bi-polar world we live in.
It seems the modern age has eliminated that period between childhood and adulthood, where everyone was educated in the ways of becoming an adult, something unilaterally understood in pre-industrial times.
If we were to look at these things analytically, we’d find the biggest abusers of children (mentally) are their parents followed by their teachers.
I think once the dust has settled (unfortunately, probably 30+ years from now), we’ll learn just how damaging it was to deny sex to adolescents just when they need it most, whilst their bodies are screaming out for it (but I suppose as long as cannon fodder is needed for more pointless wars…). The effects of a limited sex life in youth are massive, those formative years will never return and likely cannot be made up for later in life. Of course, if any Psychologist stated this now we’d never hear from them again! Science, indeed!
about 7 months ago
All this talk of adolescent fun makes me so jealous!
As an adolescent of the late 90′s/early 00′s, I don’t think there has been a worse period in time regarding lack of boys to explore with. Gay had become an “identity”, but no-one in my school was openly gay, Lord help anyone who would of been, such was the homophobic feeling (from students and teachers alike).
Ironically, I think curiosity and exploration between boys seems to have been most liberal in the 60′s and 70′s, when homophobia was rife, but there was little in the way of a “gay identity”, so boys could explore without guilt/confusion/anxiety over sexual preference or social nonsense such as the term “gay”. It was just sex, it didn’t have frankly ridiculous social connotations (especially for teenagers who may end up straight or bi-sexual).
Also, there is the increasing pressure from adults that “their children” (in much the same way they think of “their dog”, as chattel property) remain sexless innocents for as long as possible contra to the reality of earlier pubescence, the “child abuse” industry (where even children can be abusers) and the whole idea of the “sanctity of youth” and an ever increasing age when one in regarded is still regarded as a youth. Yet a day either way an you can be legally and morally deemed to be an adult, what a crazy bi-polar world we live in.
It seems the modern age has eliminated that period between childhood and adulthood, where everyone was educated in the ways of becoming an adult, something unilaterally understood in pre-industrial times.
If we were to look at these things analytically, we’d find the biggest abusers of children (mentally) are their parents followed by their teachers.
I think once the dust has settled (unfortunately, probably 30+ years from now), we’ll learn just how damaging it was to deny intercourse to adolescents just when they need it most, whilst their bodies are screaming out for it (but I suppose as long as cannon fodder is needed for more pointless wars…). The effects of a limited sex life in youth are massive, those formative years will never return and likely cannot be made up for later in life. Of course, if any Psychologist stated this now we’d never hear from them again! Science, indeed!
about 7 months ago
All this talk of adolescent fun makes me so jealous!
As an adolescent of the late 90′s/early 00′s, I don’t think there has been a worse period in time regarding lack of boys to explore with. Gay had become an “identity”, but no-one in my school was openly gay, Lord help anyone who would of been, such was the homophobic feeling (from students and teachers alike).
Ironically, I think curiosity and sexual exploration between boys seems to have been most liberal in the 60′s and 70′s, when homophobia was rife, but there was little in the way of a “gay identity”, so boys could explore without guilt/confusion/anxiety over sexual preference or social nonsense such as the term “gay”. It was just sex, it didn’t have frankly ridiculous social connotations (especially for teenagers who may end up straight or bi-sexual).
Also, there is the increasing pressure from adults that “their children” (in much the same way they think of “their dog”, as chattel property) remain sexless innocents for as long as possible contra to the reality of earlier pubescence, the “child abuse” industry (where even children can be abusers) and the whole idea of the “sanctity of youth” and an ever increasing age when one in regarded is still regarded as a youth. Yet a day either way an you can be legally and morally deemed to be an adult, what a crazy bi-polar world we live in.
It seems the modern age has eliminated that period between childhood and adulthood, where everyone was educated in the ways of becoming an adult, something unilaterally understood in pre-industrial times.
If we were to look at these things analytically, we’d find the biggest abusers of children (mentally) are their parents followed by their teachers.
I think once the dust has settled (unfortunately, probably 30+ years from now), we’ll learn just how damaging it was to deny sex to adolescents just when they need it most, whilst their bodies are screaming out for it (but I suppose as long as cannon fodder is needed for more pointless wars…). The effects of a limited sex life in youth are massive, those formative years will never return and likely cannot be made up for later in life. Of course, if any Psychologist stated this now we’d never hear from them again! Science, indeed!
about 7 months ago
All this talk of adolescent fun makes me so jealous!
As an adolescent of the late 90′s/early 00′s, I don’t think there has been a worse period in time regarding lack of boys to explore with. Gay had become an “identity”, but no-one in my school was openly gay, Lord help anyone who would of been, such was the homophobic feeling (from students and teachers alike).
Ironically, I think curiosity and sexual exploration between boys seems to have been most liberal in the 60′s and 70′s, when homophobia was rife, but there was little in the way of a “gay identity”, so boys could explore without guilt/confusion/anxiety over sexual preference or social nonsense such as the term “gay”. It was just sex, it didn’t have frankly ridiculous social connotations (especially for teenagers who may end up straight or bi-sexual).
Also, there is the increasing pressure from adults that “their children” (in much the same way they think of “their dog”, as chattel property) remain sexless innocents for as long as possible contra to the reality of earlier pubescence, the “child abuse” industry (where even children can be abusers) and the whole idea of the “sanctity of youth” and an ever increasing age when one in regarded is still regarded as a youth. Yet a day either way an you can be legally and morally deemed to be an adult, what a crazy bi-polar world we live in.
It seems the modern age has eliminated that period between childhood and adulthood, where everyone was educated in the ways of becoming an adult, something unilaterally understood in pre-industrial times.
If we were to look at these things analytically, we’d find the biggest abusers of children (mentally) are their parents followed by their teachers.
I think once the dust has settled (unfortunately, probably 30+ years from now), we’ll learn just how damaging it was to deny sex to adolescents just when they need it most, whilst their bodies are screaming out for it (but I suppose as long as cannon fodder is needed for more pointless wars…). The effects of a limited sex life in youth are massive, those formative years will never return and likely cannot be made up for later in life. Of course, if any Psychologist stated this now we’d never hear from them again! Science, indeed!
about 8 months ago
” This is just practice for girls , right ” LMAO
about 7 months ago
Why is that funny?
I believe that in a non-judgmental society (regarding sex of any type), most boys would have their first encounter, to whatever extent, with another boy, this regardless of whether they later are heterosexual, bi-sexual or homosexual.
I’m sure plenty of the boys Mike S had fun with did go on to be primarily heterosexual.
about 8 months ago
I have the perfect ring that he can put his cock in, real nice and tight. MINE. lol.
Stephen.
about 8 months ago
IT’S NOT A COCKRING. It is a set of handcuffs, one on his nutsack, and the other on his right wrist. I would almost bet that the collar he is wearing is connected to it somehow.
about 7 months ago
I don’t know how you can see that, I can’t…..especially with no right wrist showing. In any event, his cock & balls are constricted exactly like a steel cock ring would and the idea is the extra sensation from retrograde ejaculation. What’s the point of a “handcuff” there if it’s not meant to constrict?
about 7 months ago
I find this very arty and beautiful as well. Ive never been attracted to cock rings for boys but the photograph is definitely art.
-Danee
about 7 months ago
laMar is right! It’s a set of handcuffs!
I took the photo and put on the handcuffs myself :))
Someone cropped the pic. Here is the original:
http://flaum2.tumblr.com/post/16920876251
feel free to watch my whole tumblr.
Interesting discussion, by the way.
And thanx to Danee … :)
Cheers
about 7 months ago
Ahhhhh..that explains it! Your welcome, Michael! With, or without the props, this photograph is def. arty. Ill take a poster please for my room, and ask him to take off the props?
-Danee