Let Boys wear Dresses
The night before Susan and Rob allowed their son to go to preschool in a dress, they sent an e-mail to parents of his classmates. Alex, they wrote, “has been gender-fluid for as long as we can remember, and at the moment he is equally passionate about and identified with soccer players and princesses, superheroes and ballerinas (not to mention lava and unicorns, dinosaurs and glitter rainbows).” They explained that Alex had recently become inconsolable about his parents’ ban on wearing dresses beyond dress-up time. After consulting their paediatrician, a psychologist and parents of other gender-nonconforming children, they concluded that “the important thing was to teach him not to be ashamed of who he feels he is.” Thus, the purple-pink-and-yellow-striped dress he would be wearing that next morning. For good measure, their e-mail included a link to information on gender-variant children.
When Alex was 4, he pronounced himself “a boy and a girl,” but in the two years since, he has been fairly clear that he is simply a boy who sometimes likes to dress and play in conventionally feminine ways. Some days at home he wears dresses, paints his fingernails and plays with dolls; other days, he roughhouses, rams his toys together or pretends to be Spider-Man. Even his movements ricochet between parodies of gender: on days he puts on a dress, he is graceful, almost dancerlike, and his sentences rise in pitch at the end. On days he opts for only “boy” wear, he heads off with a little swagger. Of course, had Alex been a girl who sometimes dressed or played in boyish ways, no e-mail to parents would have been necessary; no one would raise an eyebrow at a girl who likes throwing a football or wearing a Spider-Man T-shirt.
There have always been people who defy gender norms. Late-19th-century medical literature described female “inverts” as appallingly straightforward, with a “dislike and sometimes incapacity for needlework” and “an inclination and taste for the sciences”; male inverts were “entirely averse to outdoor games.” By the mid-20th century, doctors were trying “corrective therapy” to extinguish atypical gender behaviors. The goal was preventing children from becoming gay or transgender, a term for those who feel they were born in the wrong body.
Many parents and clinicians now reject corrective therapy, making this the first generation to allow boys to openly play and dress (to varying degrees) in ways previously restricted to girls — to exist in what one psychologist called “that middle space” between traditional boyhood and traditional girlhood. These parents have drawn courage from a burgeoning Internet community of like-minded folk whose sons identify as boys but wear tiaras and tote unicorn backpacks. Even transgender people preserve the traditional binary gender division: born in one and belonging in the other. But the parents of boys in that middle space argue that gender is a spectrum rather than two opposing categories, neither of which any real man or woman precisely fits.
“It might make your world more tidy to have two neat and separate gender possibilities,” one North Carolina mother wrote last year on her blog, “but when you squish out the space between, you do not accurately represent lived reality. More than that, you’re trying to ‘squish out’ my kid.”
The impassioned author of that blog, Pink Is for Boys, is careful to conceal her son’s identity, as were the other parents interviewed for this article. As much as these parents want to nurture and defend what makes their children unique and happy, they also fear it will expose their sons to rejection. Some have switched schools, changed churches and even moved to try to shield their children. That tension between yielding to conformity or encouraging self-expression is felt by parents of any child who differs from the norm. But parents of so-called pink boys feel another layer of anxiety: given how central gender is to identity, they fear the wrong parenting decision could devastate their child’s social or emotional well-being. The fact that there is still substantial disagreement among prominent psychological professionals about whether to squelch unconventional behaviour or support it makes those decisions even more wrenching.
Many of the parents who allow their children to occupy that “middle space” were socially liberal even before they had a pink boy, quick to defend gay rights and women’s equality and to question the confines of traditional masculinity and femininity. But when their sons upend conventional norms, even they feel disoriented. How could my own child’s play — something ordinarily so joyous to watch — stir up such discomfort? And why does it bother me that he wants to wear a dress?
Despite the confident tone of the letter Alex’s parents wrote to the preschool parents, Susan was terrified. She feared Alex’s fascination with femininity would make him a target of bullying, even in the progressive New England town where they live. She felt tortured by statistics that indicated gay and transgender teenagers, either of which she figured Alex might become, were much more likely to take drugs and commit suicide. She began having panic attacks. “The whole thing was vertiginous,” she said. “It’s hard to put a finger on why gender identity makes such a difference to our sense of who a person is, but it does. As a parent, it’s really destabilizing when that’s pulled out from under you. And I worried that if I was having a hard time wrapping my mind around my kid, and I love him more than life itself, then how would the rest of the world react to him?” Read on…






about 9 months ago
Thank you for this article.
As a child I would play some days in “boy” clothes, other days wanted to wear a dress, or wrap myself in green gauze and “fly” around the room; sometimes I wanted to be all naked and escape all the social trappings of clothing. My parents were remarkably okay with any of it, but by and large all this happened at home — not at school.
The feminist and women’s movement did a fantastic job of creating more space for girls and women. It didn’t achieve all of its vision, but no one bats an eye at girls wearing shorts and a t-shirt, going out for sports, wanting to get a PhD, a great job, fly a plane, etc.
The men of the world have for the most part rejected the same expansion of space for males. For my own part, I’ve found ways to be comfortable in my body and with what I wear. I often wear brightly colored cloth — the “skirt” known as the lungi or the sarong — that is common in South and Southeast Asia. Friends of mine wear variations on kilts. Another friend wears dresses. This should all be a no brainer. Why can’t boys wear this kind of clothing, really!
But it touches on something deeper in the cultural psyche of many places: women can be more fluid, because of course it is natural to want to be a man, that wonderful thing, even if you can never achieve it; but for a boy to want to be female, that is like throwing away the most valuable treasure: malehood!!!
Ah, the world!
Stewart
about 9 months ago
that almost everyone is socially educated, rather than rationally educated. So much so that they cannot see beyond their current ideas, if it controverts their “social” learning.
Most people believe that the gender roles for boys and girls, men and women in their country, of their time, are “right” and have always been said way.
Of course, in the West many don’t know that male babies were once dressed in pink (pink being a sort of red junior, as in red in tooth and claw) and girls in blue (placid, associated with Virgin Mary). Not to mention that before this boys would wear an all in one sort of dress into adolescence.
In a hundred years from now, we’ll look as silly and nonsensical as the Victorians look to us!
about 9 months ago
I think there is a sociological need for gender conformity. Having said that, who is to say that society has the last say? What would you do if you saw the daily tears of your own brother, who, felt trapped in a physical body he felt no ownership to? It breaks your heart.
about 9 months ago
Uaireanta tá tú díreach a bheith ina cailín.
about 9 months ago
what does it mean in english ?
about 9 months ago
“Sometimes you just have to be a girl.” according to Google Translate.
about 9 months ago
For a long time in Western cultures (primarily), it was pretty much only females who wore earrings for “fashion.” Then approx. 25-30 years ago, this fashion made its way onto male ears and it’s become more popular since for either/both sexes. [These dates are approximate only.]
For the last 60-100 years, different colors for clothes have passed back and forth between males and females as “socially acceptable (or) standard” colors for their gender/sex.
In the late-1960s, it became more popular for females to wear pants — both for leisure and for work. In some places, kilts and other “dress-like” garments are popular for males. Some females now like to wear men’s boxers for their underwear and many males enjoy wearing noticeable “feminine” colors for their underwear.
In the last 15 years (approx.), males have wearing the smaller, “feminine” short socks for their feet that before they wouldn’t have been caught dead wearing. These short socks are now quite popular for both genders/sexes.
Things like these will always change back and forth and for some, it’s a bit of a culture shock. For others, it’s a welcome relief to not be held back by social constraints.
I think it’s slowly becoming more gender/sexual neutral as time goes on. It’s rather funny how the religious handle these gender cross-overs — how they get their knickers even more twisted with their very public outcries and “need for new laws” to put a hold on all this gender crossing.
BTW, I posted this same article in a thread on the board over two weeks ago and I received more criticism about how long the post is than what the content offered — it’s a long post for your blog as well — you didn’t finish it either and put a link to continue it [ http://www.milkboys.org/board/index.php?/topic/16934-boy-who-wants-to-wear-a-dress-whats-wrong/ ].
about 9 months ago
those short socks are awful – can’t stand them :)
about 9 months ago
Short socks are not feminine; women traditionally wore long stockings. Unless they are frilly or something. And personally I agree with Iceman.
about 9 months ago
If men can wear kilts, then boys can wear dresses! Never judge a person by their clothes, only their heart!
about 9 months ago
“Never judge a person by their clothes…”
Oh, what a dream. Martin Luther King Jr. had it. Well, a bit deeper than clothes, but you get my point.
I just watched “Hunger Games” – great movie. I was turned off by the critics who downed it for “kids killing kids”, something I didn’t want to see. But, sadly, they completely missed the point of it all. Perhaps not such a surprise.
I am so lifted by this statement: “the important thing was to teach him not to be ashamed of who he feels he is.” Too many parents, and others, have judged us, taught us to be ashamed of ourselves.
Darkshadow, very wise! I sometimes wish we could see the heart more clearly, more easily. Perhaps we would have fewer problems in this world.
hugs;
randy
about 9 months ago
Do it kid. Why gender kids under 10? It isn’t like gender means anything but for sex, and those kids don’t have any idea about sex.
Maybe the homophobes have some horrible desires deep down? All I know is basically all boys go through girly phases before 10.
Also the sarong is unisex in SE Asia, thats how society sees it – it isn’t the style of clothing that is important but how it is gendered.
about 9 months ago
Why gender humans at all?
its not like everyone with a penis is tall, hairy, has a deep voice and likes to be the super-penetrator. even biology is fluid in sex, think about intersexuality.
of course scientists did researches that “proved” that there are 2 sexes, but they grew up in a society that already told them that there are men and women.
about 9 months ago
There really is a gender fetish in western society where there is a disproportionate attention over other factors involved in sexual attraction such as age and social class. Anyone who has spent time in southeast asia may have experienced this difference first hand.
about 9 months ago
I applaud the parents that are coping with this, but the real heroes are the children themselves. To have that kinda courage and to be on the cusp of a gender breaking generation. It’s obvious that many of these children are fluid in their gender orientation. That’s been the hardest part for hetero and also gay adults to fathom. And why shouldn’t they be….why have to pick one or the other sex roles? I know people (like in the article), that get up each morning and feel gender different than the day before. It makes them more unique, more interesting and more marvelous than the average bear cub.
about 9 months ago
I agree with you. Gender fluidity is finally become acceptable by enough parents that a supportive subculture has emerged. I hope awareness and acceptance continues to evolve so the world is safe for pink boys everywhere.
about 9 months ago
wow, this site has some of the most beautiful n insightful comment going.
about 9 months ago
What a great article – it is so good to know that slowly, but surely, people are being allowed to live their life and dress how they want. I have very vague memories of dressing up occasionally in “feminine” clothes as a kid – no one ever tried to stop me, but that as that was in the 1960s I think I was probably lucky with my choice of parents. Nowadays my gender is most definitely male – BUT my sexuality is really mixed up :-) It’s taken me until the last 10 years to really work out what is going on! The ones who make the most outcry about these behaviours – the haters – are the ones who, in reality are most insecure about their own gender identity and/or sexuality.
about 8 months ago
Whats wrong with a boy who wears a dress ?
(hes not here, with me,) thats whats wrong.
come to me sweetheart, no,second thoughts
I sadly, am too old.
love
ronaldo