Mama Rainbow

Michael:
“Just think in this land if all goes the Obama way a woman can have what ever gender she wants. If it not what she want,just abort it. Try again.”

Your near total ignorance of “choice” and your full ignorance of blindly believing everything the church tells you, just astounds me.

Just because we [those who accept individual freedoms & rights] believe in their choice, that is not “carte blanche” for/that all pregnant women will/to abort for [your] ridiculous reasons. What’s really so incredibly stupid with you “believers” is that if biology were “reversed,” you fail to acknowledge that you would demand full control of, you know, your own body (I guess that’s the major reason that circumcision still stands for absolutely stupid religious reasons, only because you “believers” demand full control of everyone else, hence the real and primary purpose of religion.)

.

“In China’s ancient past homosexuality was not the normal thing at all.”

Again, you show you don’t know jack shit about cultures. In fact, homosexuality was considerably more normal and common than you think — just as it was in Japan’s history (commonly known as Feudal Japan). And I suspect very similar in Korea. It was extremely common for an older man to take in a younger male (teens and older) to be their apprentice in a particular field. Sword forging/making is one that comes to mind right now. Another is just to be a warrior. And it was common knowledge that the older would have his way with the younger as at least “partial payment” [or your own description] and the younger would gain necessary experience in his ‘chosen’ field.

Please grow up and actually learn something about cultures other than your asinine religious culture. (And even for that you are amazingly ignorant.)

How do I count the ways of your ignorance? Let me see:

One:
“Just think,if you can,that you would not be calling me stupid or ignorant if your mom had made a choice to abort you.”

If I had been aborted, I’m pretty damn sure I wouldn’t be thinking and you wouldn’t be writing about me.

Two:
“As for circumcision,that’s not a religious thing with Christians, it was a health thing,which they don’t push as much as they did when I was born.”

That can’t get any more stupid. The religious have never given a flying fuck about the health as long as they can cut that foreskin off. Interesting that it’s suppposed to represent some sort of “covenant” with god, jesus, or moses (just pick your idol with [the longest?] beard) but, in Michelangelo’s painting of jc on the cross, he is uncircumcised and he was, you know, a jew — in fact, the “king of jews” [inri].

I know this isn’t for you, but to the intelligent: Isn’t it bizarre that a cult [and that's all it is] who condemns the idea of men thinking about penises, has, as their primary piece of “proof for their god,” touching, fondling and cutting the foreskin off of young boys’ penises?

Three:
“Just because a older men took in a younger male to be their apprentice doesn’t mean that he was having sex with the boy.”

For an incredible number of them, …. the fuck they didn’t (literally). It is well documented and not only that, with the full permission of his parents because to them, that was a small price to pay for a “master of his craft” to be a mentor for him and learn a worthy craft. This way was so common, that it was expected by both the boy and his parents, usually without even being spoken.

And you’re still on that chocolate mess? You really have only a one-track mind.