Periodical Political Post *133

Queer News

Other News

  

27 thoughts on “Periodical Political Post *133”

  1. Do you know your milkboard is offline now and has been for at least an hour?

    Well, it’s back online now but your buttons don’t seem to work.

  2. May I point out that you have only posted about the British boy from mansfield, who raped a 65 year old. Because I posted it on /hm/ ;) I feel like a news reported now :)

      1. aha, well the piece of news had gone entirely un-noticed until i brought it to the attention of the internet :D i mean, it happened like 2 miles away from where i live ¬_¬ … i still feel special ;)

  3. They lock up 15 year old boys who try to rape 65 year old guys in England? The geezers on this forum sit up nights praying for such things.

  4. Being so anti gay hits back so hard. Kids try to be the same way, or copying attitudes they find targets to show their anti gay attitudes in attempt to be accepted among peers and do the right thing as they believe it. The other kids aren’t neccessarily gay. Some are just different, but who cares. Our attitudes hits our kids very painfully.

  5. “Thai transgender stewardess airline suspends flights after 10 months.”

    This may have been an interesting idea but it clearly wasn’t thought out properly and obviously didn’t have enough financial backing.

    The first mistake was announcing the transgender stewardesses out front instead of allowing the passengers to “find out” on their own. If the stewardesses dressed and behaved in a professional manner, it shouldn’t have been much of an issue after a passenger was already in flight. But I think the entire situation probably boiled up inside a lot of “potential” customers because they probably were “turned off” to the idea of it being “in their face.” But a relatively brief flight wouldn’t have raised any “shackles” of the vast majority of fliers if they didn’t know outright “who” their stewardesses were.

    Also, if you’re going to start an “airline,” even with only one plane, you’d better have enough capital available for at least 1 year (if not more) of operational expenses — especially if it’s going to be a “different” airline and flying “experience.”

    Btw, you can delete the first comment now since you’re back online (and delete this statement as well).

  6. Extremist Church.
    Supervised in the bathroom due to concerns about masterbation is so 1950’s. Beating the gay out of a boy was the first recomended cure for homosexuality. I remember boys in my First Baptist Church who were beaten severly by their fathers when caught masterbating. I watched my father severly beating my cousin when he was found masterbating in his room. Back then it was thought that boys who masterbated or “played with themselves” would become “queer.” Gay was not a common term as queer was the operative word.


  7. Alfred Douglas:

    They lock up 15 year old boys who try to rape 65 year old guys in England? The geezers on this forum sit up nights praying for such things.

    He admitted to rape and attempted rape.
    Rape is rape, and not a subject to be made fun of.

    1. The actual story begs that rape was the only conviction possible to charge the boy with. I.e. the courts in nottinghamshire are in a state of “lock up any disobedient youths” after last summers riots.

    2. sylvatica – for cryin’ out loud, change the batteries in your sense of humor. And then go shove your pious phoney-baloney sensitivity.

      1. Actually, horselips, change the batteries in whatever part of your brain tells you that rape is funny.

        1. The rabid feminists think that rape can even be a “lustful glance”. The legal definitions of “rape” are comical beyond belief. And in England and America doubly so. ROTFL

  8. “A 15-year-old boy from Nottinghamshire has pleaded guilty to raping a 65-year-old man.”
    WTF?!

  9. “A 15-year-old boy from Nottinghamshire has pleaded guilty to raping a 65-year-old man.”

    Indeed, WTF?

    Doesn’t this break all the sacred truths we’ve learnt over the last 25+ years:

    1. In any sexual interaction between any adult and a minor, the minor is always the victim and is in fact a sexless innocent, the adult being an abuser of power and sexless innocence (unless, of course, said minor has sex with another younger minor, then they become the abuser and corrupter of innocence…some logic there or perhaps, some justice!)

    2. The adult always has power over a minor (physical/mental/social etc) hence a minor can never consent to sex with an adult, let alone force it upon an adult.

    3. A minor is an “innocent” and knows nothing of sex (unless abusing the innocence of another, younger or weaker, i.e female, minor)

    I can hardly fathom the situation in today’s climate in which the boy, regardless of any actuality of “rape”, got charged with rape of an elderly man. The only way I can see it happening is if the man was severely mentally, but more likely also physically disabled, but even then…?

    This is really disturbing stuff, because it is like the inversion of “paedophilia”, how will the British mind handle it? How will the world handle it? There is the potential to cause anarchy that will make the London riots look tame.

    sylvatica says:

    “He admitted to rape and attempted rape.”

    He admitted it, so it must be true! One would of thought he either raped or did not, hence he is either a rapist or an attempted rapist (assuming the confession is an accurate one). Of course, such small things as vagaries of the English language should not stand in the way of a good case for prosecution of a sex crime.

    “Rape is rape, and not a subject to be made fun of.”

    Yes, every incident of rape, real or imagined is exactly the same, in exactly the same circumstances with exactly the same outcome. “Rape is rape” is the cry of a reactionary fanatic who can only think in black and white terms. I’m not surprised to see a British flag next to your post, as knee-jerk fanatics is probably the most apt description of the “Great British public”.

    It seems not only is it a subject not to be made fun of, but a subject the definition of which is totally forbidden to discuss, so the only description we know resides in our “collective gut”.

    I’m just surprised you didn’t end with “string ‘im up” or “bring back the death penalty”.

    1. That reply is too far for one single sentenced news article… I get the feeling you’ve studied english as a foreign language, and are now in the position to throw complicated after complicated vocabulary at whom it may concern.

      Rape is rape… And in England, one party can commit crime against any other party.
      Just as one disabled person can murder another and still be prosecuted equally and without discrimination, so can a youth.
      Sylveticus is right that it’s not a funny subject, I just find it awkward and un-suprising given the state of Mansfield town. Honestly, I wouldnt be surprised if the older gentleman was the youths grandfather… Or knowing there, probably great great grandfather.

      1. Jim has written one of the best replies I have ever read on this blog. It is written so that even a child can understand what he has said. My compliments, Jim!

      2. Jim’s comments were complex but not complicated. There are times when the simple can be better explained by the more complex.


  10. horselips:

    sylvatica – for cryin’ out loud, change the batteries in your sense of humor. And then go shove your pious phoney-baloney sensitivity.

    I second that! :P

    1. I third that!
      I often wonder why moral hysterics like sylvatica even come to this blog. Fortunately there are only a few of them that post here,

      1. Thanks Trevor, after posting comments on here for the past 4 years, I’m sticking to the boards from now on. Bryan Fischer would be proud of the bitchiness of some of the people on this board.
        I pity if some insecure gay teen posts a comment then gets ripped apart by a bitter old Queen.
        Josh, In future, I’ll be only recommending the boards on my FB page, and warn others of the bile that is spewed here.
        Adios.

        1. This blog has become a cesspool over the yrs, with seething, back biting, self-hating boylovers vying for the ‘wittiest’ response. You were wise to leave for the boards, as this has ceased to be a safe place for real teens to come a long time ago….

  11. I’am just a simple guy who always did think that rape is just that,rape. I never did believe that I could be in the category of moral hysterics, or do I sit up at night praying to get rape. I don’t believe that anyone would pray to get raped, unless they are brain dead. Forcing sex on someone, no matter what their gender is, is wrong.

    1. You may consider yourself a simple guy, but rape, the concept, it’s execution and consequences certainly is not.

      Isn’t it so glaringly obvious that “rape is rape”, that it needn’t be stated? It’s a bit like saying “dogs are dogs” or “cats are cats”. As far as I can see, it’s stated because people want all rapes to be treated equally harshly/rashly, when all rapes (as everything else in life) are not equal.

      As I already said, “Yes, every incident of rape, real or imagined is exactly the same, in exactly the same circumstances with exactly the same outcome” (<-sarcasm)

  12. @Real1
    It’s never the real teens that do all the bitching here. It’s people like you, the old queens who fancy themselves to be do-gooders, who are the pricks. IMHO

  13. Just for the record, Real1 has a savior complex. In his profile he calls himself Shepherd. Lords over what he thinks is his flock.

Leave a Reply