Skin

Are you for real?!?!!? Photography business must be slow even for someone of your technical prowess, since you sure seem to have lots of time to come here and make ridiculous comments.

Oh, and I’m pretty hard up. Thanks for asking.

Wow….missed that but yeah, not symmetrical and lower than the other. I had a ‘third’ nipple for awhile in my youth. It was a ‘spider mole’ that eventually disappeared. Guessing this is perhaps a mole? Somebody help us with the rest of the ‘set’…..

How is it so easy to completely miss someone’s point?

And, why do all of your repsonses have to come across so harshly? I think, Penboy, your reply raises a few valid questions, but did you really need to include words like “absurd” and phrases such as “doesn’t make a lot of sense” and insult the boy’s respect for his mother’s wishes? Couldn’t you have made your points without the vitriol?

As far as Liam’s comment, it seems fairly clear that the point he is making is not whether we can appreciate the photo based on age, but rather whether the “teen” in the photo has fully consented to having this picture taken (or, if he is a minor, is even capable of consenting)and having it posted on the internet. The question is the back story behind the photo, not what we as viewers should appreciate. I don’t think Liam is worried about the morality of us looking at pictures of underage teens, but under what circumstances those pictures came into existence.

And Liam did pose it as a question; asking us what we thought about the moral (and perhaps legal) ramifications of its posting – the implication being that he was not even completely sure of the answers, himself. Yet, instead of participating in a mature discussion of the issue, you tell him his questions are nonsense and assert that he can’t think for himself.